404 static html vs. ISAPI Rewrite?

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

Keeping an eye on SEO, I've been reading this forum many time...
However a question comes up... What would be better to use?
The 404 static html  or the ISAPI rewrite? 

I currently have a custom 404.asp page that I like to keep, as old pages are nicely forwarded (code 301) and gives a nice message (404) to the users where they can leave some comments about the error they received (using a form)...
(See details on this here / latest post on this)

What would be better to do, the ISAPI rewrite idea or the 404 static html as described by EarlyImpact?
If suggested the 404 static html method, is it easy (for a non-asp guru) to implement my current 404.asp code?

Your ideas on this please 

Edited by worldofrugs - 11-June-2008 at 3:29pm

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
worldofrugs Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Senior Member Joined: 24-April-2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 0	Post Options Post Reply Quote worldofrugs Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: 404 static html vs. ISAPI Rewrite? Posted: 11-June-2008 at 3:05pm
	Keeping an eye on SEO, I've been reading this forum many time... However a question comes up... What would be better to use? The 404 static html or the ISAPI rewrite? I currently have a custom 404.asp page that I like to keep, as old pages are nicely forwarded (code 301) and gives a nice message (404) to the users where they can leave some comments about the error they received (using a form)... (See details on this here / latest post on this) What would be better to do, the ISAPI rewrite idea or the 404 static html as described by EarlyImpact? If suggested the 404 static html method, is it easy (for a non-asp guru) to implement my current 404.asp code? Your ideas on this please Edited by worldofrugs - 11-June-2008 at 3:29pm